Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-4.1 Mini vs Mistral Nemo
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-4.1 Mini wins on 3/3 benchmarks
GPT-4.1 Mini wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in general · knowledge · math.
Category leads
general·GPT-4.1 Miniknowledge·GPT-4.1 Minimath·GPT-4.1 Mini
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-4.1 Mini
#211 by perf·no signal
Mistral Nemo
#234 by perf·no signal
Best value
Mistral Nemo
37.2x better value than GPT-4.1 Mini
GPT-4.1 Mini
36.6 pts/$
$1.00/M
Mistral Nemo
1363.3 pts/$
$0.02/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Mistral AI
$14.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
3 benchmarks · 2 models
GPT-4.1 MiniMistral Nemo
Dtbench
GPT-4.1 Mini leads by +33.6
GPT-4.1 Mini
48.0
Mistral Nemo
14.3
GPQA diamond
GPT-4.1 Mini leads by +47.9
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-4.1 Mini
54.5
Mistral Nemo
6.5
MATH level 5
GPT-4.1 Mini leads by +76.5
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
GPT-4.1 Mini
87.3
Mistral Nemo
10.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Mini | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
Dtbench | 48.0 | 14.3 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 54.5 | 6.5 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 87.3 | 10.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.40 | $1.60 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $7.00 | |
| $0.02 | $0.03 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $0.22 |
People also compared