Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GLM 4.6V vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GLM 4.6V wins on 7/8 benchmarks
GLM 4.6V wins 7 of 8 shared benchmarks. Leads in reasoning · language · math.
Category leads
coding·GPT-5.4 Nanoreasoning·GLM 4.6Vlanguage·GLM 4.6Vmath·GLM 4.6Vknowledge·GLM 4.6V
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GLM 4.6V
#188 by perf·#3 by attention
GPT-5.4 Nano
#237 by perf·#4 by attention
Best value
GLM 4.6V
1.5x better value than GPT-5.4 Nano
GLM 4.6V
66.8 pts/$
$0.60/M
GPT-5.4 Nano
45.1 pts/$
$0.72/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
z-ai
private · undisclosed
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
8 benchmarks · 2 models
GLM 4.6VGPT-5.4 Nano
LiveBench · Agentic Coding
GPT-5.4 Nano leads by +23.8
GLM 4.6V
3.3
GPT-5.4 Nano
27.1
LiveBench · Coding
GLM 4.6V leads by +2.4
GLM 4.6V
64.2
GPT-5.4 Nano
61.9
LiveBench · Data Analysis
GLM 4.6V leads by +7.3
GLM 4.6V
46.4
GPT-5.4 Nano
39.1
LiveBench · If
GLM 4.6V leads by +0.6
GLM 4.6V
17.1
GPT-5.4 Nano
16.5
LiveBench · Language
GLM 4.6V leads by +21.1
GLM 4.6V
49.7
GPT-5.4 Nano
28.7
LiveBench · Mathematics
GLM 4.6V leads by +26.5
GLM 4.6V
62.5
GPT-5.4 Nano
36.0
LiveBench · Overall
GLM 4.6V leads by +7.7
GLM 4.6V
40.1
GPT-5.4 Nano
32.4
LiveBench · Reasoning
GLM 4.6V leads by +19.8
GLM 4.6V
37.2
GPT-5.4 Nano
17.4
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6V | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
LiveBench · Agentic Coding | 3.3 | 27.1 |
LiveBench · Coding | 64.2 | 61.9 |
LiveBench · Data Analysis | 46.4 | 39.1 |
LiveBench · If | 17.1 | 16.5 |
LiveBench · Language | 49.7 | 28.7 |
LiveBench · Mathematics | 62.5 | 36.0 |
LiveBench · Overall | 40.1 | 32.4 |
LiveBench · Reasoning | 37.2 | 17.4 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.30 | $0.90 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $4.50 | |
| $0.20 | $1.25 | 400K tokens (~200 books) | $4.63 |