Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

GPT-6 Astra wins 27 of 43 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · agentic · reasoning.

Category leads
speed·GPT-6 Astraagentic·GPT-6 Astrareasoning·GPT-6 Astraknowledge·GPT-6 Astramath·GPT-6 Astrageneral·GPT-6 Astracoding·GPT-6 Astraarena·Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Hype vs Reality
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#137 by perf·#5 by attention
DESERVED
Gemini 3 Pro
#71 by perf·#5 by attention
DESERVED
GPT-6 Astra
#9 by perf·#1 by attention
DESERVED
Best value
2.7x better value than GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
6.9 pts/$
$7.00/M
Gemini 3 Pro
n/a
no price
GPT-6 Astra
2.6 pts/$
$30.00/M
Vendor risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$4.20T·Tier 1
Low risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$4.20T·Tier 1
Low risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Head to head
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3 ProGPT-6 Astra
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GPT-6 Astra leads by +11.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
29.7
Gemini 3 Pro
41.3
GPT-6 Astra
52.7
APEX-Agents
GPT-6 Astra leads by +29.4
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
35.3
Gemini 3 Pro
18.4
GPT-6 Astra
64.7
ARC-AGI
GPT-6 Astra leads by +0.5
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
98.0
Gemini 3 Pro
75.0
GPT-6 Astra
98.5
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-6 Astra leads by +17.9
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
77.1
Gemini 3 Pro
31.1
GPT-6 Astra
95.0
Balrog
GPT-6 Astra leads by +10.2
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
57.0
Gemini 3 Pro
58.1
GPT-6 Astra
68.3
Chess Puzzles
GPT-6 Astra leads by +17.9
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
52.6
Gemini 3 Pro
27.4
GPT-6 Astra
70.5
GPQA diamond
GPT-6 Astra leads by +1.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
92.6
Gemini 3 Pro
90.2
GPT-6 Astra
94.4
HLE
GPT-6 Astra leads by +8.8
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
43.7
Gemini 3 Pro
34.4
GPT-6 Astra
52.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.6
Gemini 3 Pro
91.4
GPT-6 Astra
100.0
Proofbench
GPT-6 Astra leads by +73.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.0
Gemini 3 Pro
20.0
GPT-6 Astra
99.0
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-6 Astra leads by +2.1
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
73.5
Gemini 3 Pro
72.9
GPT-6 Astra
75.6
WeirdML
GPT-6 Astra leads by +21.5
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
72.1
Gemini 3 Pro
69.9
GPT-6 Astra
93.6
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Gemini 3 Pro leads by +23.6
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
21.4
Gemini 3 Pro
45.0
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +29.5
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68.8
Gemini 3 Pro
39.4
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
GPT-6 Astra leads by +14.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
17.7
GPT-6 Astra
31.7
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
GPT-6 Astra leads by +38.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
13.8
GPT-6 Astra
52.1
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond
GPT-6 Astra leads by +2.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
94.1
GPT-6 Astra
96.1
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
GPT-6 Astra leads by +7.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
47.0
GPT-6 Astra
54.7
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
82.0
GPT-6 Astra
80.7
Artificial Analysis · MMMU Pro
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
82.4
GPT-6 Astra
86.9
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
58.7
GPT-6 Astra
56.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +7.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1446.2
Gemini 3 Pro
1439.0
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1487.0
Gemini 3 Pro
1485.5
Cl Bench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +5.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
20.8
Gemini 3 Pro
15.8
DeepResearch Bench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.5
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
47.8
Gemini 3 Pro
46.3
Deepswe
GPT-6 Astra leads by +62.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
11.7
GPT-6 Astra
74.1
Dtbench
GPT-6 Astra leads by +0.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.1
GPT-6 Astra
95.5
Ebr Bench
GPT-6 Astra leads by +61.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
14.3
GPT-6 Astra
76.2
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Gemini 3 Pro leads by +29.1
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
36.9
Gemini 3 Pro
66.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Gemini 3 Pro leads by +14.6
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
16.7
Gemini 3 Pro
31.3
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
GPT-6 Astra leads by +70.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.8
GPT-6 Astra
97.6
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
GPT-6 Astra leads by +34.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
59.6
GPT-6 Astra
93.7
Furniture Assembly
GPT-6 Astra leads by +71.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
0.0
GPT-6 Astra
71.4
GSO-Bench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +3.9
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
22.6
Gemini 3 Pro
18.6
Lmca
GPT-6 Astra leads by +12.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
63.3
GPT-6 Astra
75.7
Metr Time Horizons
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +6.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
77.0
Gemini 3 Pro
71.0
Mirrorcode
GPT-6 Astra leads by +37.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
8.9
GPT-6 Astra
46.7
Mystery Game Puzzles
GPT-6 Astra leads by +55.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
27.3
GPT-6 Astra
82.4
PostTrainBench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +3.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
22.0
Gemini 3 Pro
18.1
Remote Labor Index
GPT-6 Astra leads by +19.6
Gemini 3 Pro
1.3
GPT-6 Astra
20.8
SimpleBench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +3.8
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
75.5
Gemini 3 Pro
71.7
SWE-Bench verified
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.7
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
75.6
Gemini 3 Pro
72.9
Terminal Bench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +10.8
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
80.2
Gemini 3 Pro
69.4
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3 ProGPT-6 Astra
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
29.741.352.7
APEX-Agents
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
35.318.464.7
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
98.075.098.5
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
77.131.195.0
Balrog
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
57.058.168.3
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
52.627.470.5
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
92.690.294.4
HLE
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
43.734.452.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
95.691.4100.0
Proofbench
26.020.099.0
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
73.572.975.6
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
72.169.993.6
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
21.445.0—
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
68.839.4—
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
17.7—31.7
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
13.8—52.1
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond
94.1—96.1
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
47.0—54.7
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
82.0—80.7
Artificial Analysis · MMMU Pro
82.4—86.9
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
58.7—56.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
1446.21439.0—
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
1487.01485.5—
Cl Bench
20.815.8—
DeepResearch Bench
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
47.846.3—
Deepswe
11.7—74.1
Dtbench
95.1—95.5
Ebr Bench
14.3—76.2
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
36.966.0—
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
16.731.3—
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
26.8—97.6
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
59.6—93.7
Furniture Assembly
0.0—71.4
GSO-Bench
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
22.618.6—
Lmca
63.3—75.7
Metr Time Horizons
77.071.0—
Mirrorcode
8.9—46.7
Mystery Game Puzzles
27.3—82.4
PostTrainBench
22.018.1—
Remote Labor Index
—1.320.8
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
75.571.7—
SWE-Bench verified
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
75.672.9—
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
80.269.4—
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
Google DeepMind logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$2.00$12.001.0M tokens (~524 books)$45.00
Google DeepMind logoGemini 3 Pro————
OpenAI logoGPT-6 Astra$10.00$50.001.1M tokens (~525 books)$200.00