Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) wins on 5/5 benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · arena.
Category leads
speed·Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)arena·Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
#170 by perf·#9 by attention
MiMo-V2-Flash
#13 by perf·no signal
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash
800.0x better value than Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
0.5 pts/$
$90.00/M
MiMo-V2-Flash
385.8 pts/$
$0.19/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Xiaomi (MiMo)
$111.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
5 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)MiMo-V2-Flash
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +18.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
67.6
MiMo-V2-Flash
48.8
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +14.6
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
48.1
MiMo-V2-Flash
33.5
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +11.5
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
53.0
MiMo-V2-Flash
41.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +205.7
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
1542.2
MiMo-V2-Flash
1336.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +111.6
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
1503.7
MiMo-V2-Flash
1392.1
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 67.6 | 48.8 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 48.1 | 33.5 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 53.0 | 41.5 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1542.2 | 1336.5 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1503.7 | 1392.1 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $30.00 | $150.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $600.00 | |
| $0.09 | $0.29 | 262K tokens (~131 books) | $1.40 |