Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GLM 5 Turbo vs GPT-5.4
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.4 wins on 3/5 benchmarks
GPT-5.4 wins 3 of 5 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed.
Category leads
speed·GPT-5.4arena·Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
#170 by perf·#9 by attention
GLM 5 Turbo
no bench·#3 by attention
GPT-5.4
#104 by perf·#4 by attention
Best value
GPT-5.4
12.4x better value than Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
0.5 pts/$
$90.00/M
GLM 5 Turbo
n/a
$2.60/M
GPT-5.4
6.0 pts/$
$8.75/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
z-ai
private · undisclosed
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
5 benchmarks · 3 models
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)GLM 5 TurboGPT-5.4
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +1.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
67.6
GLM 5 Turbo
63.1
GPT-5.4
69.4
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +9.2
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
48.1
GLM 5 Turbo
44.2
GPT-5.4
57.3
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +4.2
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
53.0
GLM 5 Turbo
38.1
GPT-5.4
57.2
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +147.1
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
1542.2
GPT-5.4
1395.0
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) leads by +38.9
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
1503.7
GPT-5.4
1464.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 67.6 | 63.1 | 69.4 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 48.1 | 44.2 | 57.3 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 53.0 | 38.1 | 57.2 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1542.2 | — | 1395.0 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1503.7 | — | 1464.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $30.00 | $150.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $600.00 | |
| $1.20 | $4.00 | 203K tokens (~101 books) | $19.00 | |
| $2.50 | $15.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $56.25 |